A Motion to Update Policy E.6 Entry-Level Education of Occupational Therapists and Occupational Therapy Assistants


I am receiving email asking for assistance in drafting specific language for RA Motions related to the entry level educational mandates.  Here are my suggestions - please work with your RA representatives and each other to coordinate efforts.

II. BODY OF MOTION:

I move that the Representative Assembly revise Policy E.6 to read as follows: 

PURPOSE: To state the education required for entry into occupational therapy.   

IT SHALL BE THE POLICY OF THE ASSOCIATION THAT: 
 1. The Association recommends and supports entry-level education at the associate and bachelor degree level for occupational therapy assistants.  
2. The Association recommends and supports entry level education at the master’s and doctoral degree levels for occupational therapists.   
3. Consistent with the Association’s desire to improve practice, education, and research, the Association will take active steps to promote new programs and to assist existing programs to develop in ways that are congruent with the preparation of graduates who have the ability to frame, analyze, and solve complex practice problems.  Any active steps taken by the Association must be within the parameters that are outlined in this Policy, specifically, with support of dual levels of entry for the OTA (associate and bachelor level) and dual levels of entry for the OT (master's and doctoral level).


III. RATIONALE:

·    1. The RA is directly responsible for establishing professional standards and policies as stated in AOTA Articles of Incorporation. 
     2. The existing policy does not address the dual level of entry for OTA practice.  Also, the previous Policy as written was not followed by the Association and did not explicate the parameters under which the Association should promote and assist educational programs, which contributed to overreach by ACOTE who unduly attempted to circumvent Association policy with escalated educational requirements.   
     3. This motion clearly limits any other associated functional group within the Association from circumventing the RA, which is the body responsible for establishing professional standards and policies – including the establishment of entry level standards for entry to the profession. 
      (See ‘FAQs from AOTA’s Board of Directors on the OT and OTA Mandates’ and ‘Education Mandates Background Materials,’ specifically the ‘Board Memos to ACOTE’ after 7/12/18 meeting and 8/14/18).
    4. The proposed policy supports AOTA Vision 2025 by ensuring a diverse and appropriately trained workforce that is able to promote health, well-being, and quality of life.
    5. The proposed policy is specifically related to Strategic Priority Goal #2: Prepare and develop the profession.



IV. RESOURCES: 

1. AOTA Staff (e.g., number of staff, lawyers, consultants, authors, and/or subject matter experts).  AOTA staff will require appropriate training on the Policy to ensure that functional units within the Association do not act in contravention of Association policy.               

2. AOTA Volunteers (please indicate type and number anticipated).   AOTA volunteers will require appropriate training on the Policy to ensure that the actions and decisions of volunteers do not act in contravention of Association policy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Deconstructing the myth of clothing sensitivity as a 'sensory processing disorder'

Please note first that there is no formally recognized clinical designation of  'sensory processing disorder.'   It is a term constructed by occupational therapists that has not been formally recognized by the larger medical community. In our clinic we receive many referrals from local pediatricians when parents have concerns about children being overly sensitive to their clothing.  Most often the children referred are from four to seven years old and the families are severely disrupted by the children's behaviors and responses to clothing issues.  Commonly, children will have severely constricted tolerance for certain outfits, want to wear the same clothes repeatedly, complain that clothing is itchy/scratch/bumpy/wiggly/ouchie, and this all leads to disruption of daily dressing routines.  There is no doubt that the behavioral concerns are very real. The pediatricians tend to be appropriately conservative and provide families with good behavioral management suggestions
Read more

On retained primitive reflexes

Each year I receive several emails from colleagues about 'retained primitive reflexes.'  I am also seeing an increased number of reports from local 'health care' providers who are documenting these alleged problems so I thought I would write a summary of my opinion on this topic.   Predatory 'health care' providers including some OTs, PTs, chiropractors, and behavioral optometrists are creating a new 'market' for treating this alleged 'problem.'  Parents should be very wary of these practitioners and other professionals should challenge these practices whenever they are seen. The following is the kind of information that causes concern and was provided to me by a colleague as a sample from a student's IEP: The student continues to demonstrate the following retained primitive reflexes that at times interfere with his ability to demonstrate appropriate adaptive responses: Fear Paralysis Reflex, Moro Reflex, Palmer Reflex, Tonic Labyri
Read more

Twenty years of SIPT - where do we go next?

Standardized tests are periodically discarded or updated because the normative group that the test was developed around may have changed characteristics. I am unaware of any 'industry standards' regarding the life expectancy of standardized tests; rather, professionals in a field tend to come to consensus about the relative usefulness of tests on their own. I would be interested in knowing what other therapists think about the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests - which were published in 1989. I became certified in the administration of these tests seventeen years ago. At first I found them highly useful but the more I gave the tests the more I understood the limitations. Now it has gotten to a point where I do my best to discourage people when they ask for this test - not just because of the inherent weaknesses of the test construction but also because of how old the norms are. There have been some legitimate concerns with the tests including extremely poor test-retest re
Read more