ACTS wins injunction for early intervention conflict of interest regulation


There is a preliminary injunction regarding the Early Intervention arms length (conflict of interest) regulations.  The new regulations that prohibit agencies from both evaluating and providing services will apparently not be in effect until a final decision in the case is granted.  Municipalities are now waiting for actual BEI direction on how to proceed.

 For background:

 1. The NYS Developmental Disabilities Planning Council has a good compilation of links describing the adopted changes HERE

2. My blog post supporting the regulations and additional justification for that support can be found HERE

 3. You can view the ACTS press release HERE.  I have a copy of the order granting the injunction but am having some technical difficulties getting it uploaded onto my server - so I will provide a link as soon as I am able.

 The order is very interesting and the Court essentially found that there was merit to the argument that the Governor overstepped his authority and bypassed the legislature because these changes were initially presented to the legislature and voted down.

 It seems that the Court rejected statistics related to frequency of self-referral and it will be interesting to see if that information is re-presented because the data is in fact compelling.  I am wondering why the Court did not see it that way.

 The most important consideration for providers is that a lawsuit claiming technical errors in Executive process may temporarily keep the political barbarians from the clinical gate of the early intervention program.  However, the barbarians were using battering rams the first time around.  Just wait until they break out the trebuchets - because you can be certain that this is no longer just a pragmatic concern of the Counties related to their Medicaid costs - now it is also a slap across the face of Executive power.   

 I believe in checks and balances too - but this is a time when we should be contributing to policy creation by negotiation and participation.  Attempting to solve this through the Courts might not lead to an end that people really want.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Deconstructing the myth of clothing sensitivity as a 'sensory processing disorder'

Please note first that there is no formally recognized clinical designation of  'sensory processing disorder.'   It is a term constructed by occupational therapists that has not been formally recognized by the larger medical community. In our clinic we receive many referrals from local pediatricians when parents have concerns about children being overly sensitive to their clothing.  Most often the children referred are from four to seven years old and the families are severely disrupted by the children's behaviors and responses to clothing issues.  Commonly, children will have severely constricted tolerance for certain outfits, want to wear the same clothes repeatedly, complain that clothing is itchy/scratch/bumpy/wiggly/ouchie, and this all leads to disruption of daily dressing routines.  There is no doubt that the behavioral concerns are very real. The pediatricians tend to be appropriately conservative and provide families with good behavioral management suggestions
Read more

On retained primitive reflexes

Each year I receive several emails from colleagues about 'retained primitive reflexes.'  I am also seeing an increased number of reports from local 'health care' providers who are documenting these alleged problems so I thought I would write a summary of my opinion on this topic.   Predatory 'health care' providers including some OTs, PTs, chiropractors, and behavioral optometrists are creating a new 'market' for treating this alleged 'problem.'  Parents should be very wary of these practitioners and other professionals should challenge these practices whenever they are seen. The following is the kind of information that causes concern and was provided to me by a colleague as a sample from a student's IEP: The student continues to demonstrate the following retained primitive reflexes that at times interfere with his ability to demonstrate appropriate adaptive responses: Fear Paralysis Reflex, Moro Reflex, Palmer Reflex, Tonic Labyri
Read more

Twenty years of SIPT - where do we go next?

Standardized tests are periodically discarded or updated because the normative group that the test was developed around may have changed characteristics. I am unaware of any 'industry standards' regarding the life expectancy of standardized tests; rather, professionals in a field tend to come to consensus about the relative usefulness of tests on their own. I would be interested in knowing what other therapists think about the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests - which were published in 1989. I became certified in the administration of these tests seventeen years ago. At first I found them highly useful but the more I gave the tests the more I understood the limitations. Now it has gotten to a point where I do my best to discourage people when they ask for this test - not just because of the inherent weaknesses of the test construction but also because of how old the norms are. There have been some legitimate concerns with the tests including extremely poor test-retest re
Read more