In light of the proposed 2025 revisions to the AOTA Code of Ethics, I feel compelled to respond—not just as a practitioner and educator, but as someone who has been observing and writing about the profession’s ethical evolution for over a decade. This post reflects on concerns raised in the new draft and situates them in a broader historical context drawn from earlier critiques I published in 2011, 2013, 2014, and 2015. When Ethics Become Ideology The proposed 2025 Code of Ethics contains well-meaning language that reflects cultural currents around equity, inclusion, and advocacy. However, the revised document appears to shift the Code away from its core purpose—guiding ethical behavior—and toward promoting a specific ideological framework. It contains language and assumptions that may unintentionally alienate practitioners, obscure clarity in enforcement, and conflate professional conduct with political conformity. A Critical Logic Problem The most serious concern is the...
Comments
Speaking of polls - just put one up on our blog regarding daily physical education and 504/IEP at PE and 504 IEP. Please take a moment to answer it just for fun.
So, I think it's not required
see http://www.caot.ca/default.asp?pageid=448
When there is a lack of standards there is a lot of unfortunate opportunity for confusion.
NY State still does not require that occupational therapy assistants pass the NBCOT examination, which in my opinion is simply unacceptable. Allowing people to practice on limited permits under supervision until they pass their exam is fine - but the lack of a permanent credentialing requirement causes harm to the profession and is a danger to the public.