Mixing up chickens and eggs: A response to Fleming-Castaldy and Gillen
In the recent AJOT Fleming-Castaldy and Gillen wrote an interesting article entitled "The issue is: Ensuring that education, certification, and practice are evidence based." In the article, they examine why outdated neurophysiologic techniques are promoted in the profession of occupational therapy as opposed to more current and evidence based motor learning and motor control theories. They argue that outdated models based on Bobath and Brunnstrom have no place in contemporary practice. In spirit I agree wholeheartedly. There are many techniques that are still present in contemporary practice and we hang onto those techniques even in the face of mounting evidence that other models are more appropriate. I have spent considerable time in this blog discussing this issue as it relates to certain sensory-based approaches and the very limited evidence that exists for their continued promotion and use. Toward the end of the article they suggest that educators need to...