What Can We Learn from Maine? A Case Study in the Shifting Ethics of Occupational Therapy

In my previous post, I raised concerns about the increasing use of politicized language in the AOTA Code of Ethics. I argued that terms like equity and justice—however well-intentioned—have taken on broad, contested meanings, and that their uncritical adoption into our profession’s foundational documents risks substituting moral clarity for ideological fashion. In further research, I’ve come across something worth examining in more detail: how the state of Maine handled two different versions of AOTA’s Code of Ethics—first in 2010, and then again in 2023. The difference between these two adoption events reveals a great deal about how professional ethics are evolving—not necessarily for the better. Maine in 2010: Ethical Caution In 2010, the Maine Board of Occupational Therapy adopted AOTA’s then-current Code of Ethics with exclusions. Specifically, they removed Principle 4: Social Justice, signaling that parts of the document were seen as extending beyond enforceable professional condu...