AOTA's claim to authority over entry level degree requirements
ACOTE released their version of the timeline of their OTD accreditation decision and AOTA released their statement along with the MOU - and now the two sides sit in opposition with the fundamental question being "Who is responsible for setting the entry level educational standards for the occupational therapy profession?"
The quick and easy answer, that apparently may be wrong, is ACOTE.
The more probable answer, buried in documents available on the AOTA website, is the Representative Assembly of the AOTA.
The next logical question is: Does the Representative Assembly have this authority? Yes, it does, and this authority is directly granted in the Bylaws:
Does ACOTE have the authority to set AOTA association policy, specifically related to entry level educational requirements for the profession? No, it does not, and this is very clear in the Bylaws:
The degree to which this relationship has been respected or not respected in the past is open to debate, and would also require a temporal context of the Bylaws at the time that various entry level decisions were made. However, it is clear to me that it is not as cut and dry as ACOTE suggests. Reference the document on the AOTA website that talks about the history of the OTD, how the RA made the recommendation, and how it is the responsibility of the RA to establish association policy.
So now the question is whether or not ACOTE has the authority to establish entry level requirements. Ask your Representative Assembly members their opinions.