ACTS wins injunction for early intervention conflict of interest regulation


There is a preliminary injunction regarding the Early Intervention arms length (conflict of interest) regulations.  The new regulations that prohibit agencies from both evaluating and providing services will apparently not be in effect until a final decision in the case is granted.  Municipalities are now waiting for actual BEI direction on how to proceed.

 For background:

 1. The NYS Developmental Disabilities Planning Council has a good compilation of links describing the adopted changes HERE

2. My blog post supporting the regulations and additional justification for that support can be found HERE

 3. You can view the ACTS press release HERE.  I have a copy of the order granting the injunction but am having some technical difficulties getting it uploaded onto my server - so I will provide a link as soon as I am able.

 The order is very interesting and the Court essentially found that there was merit to the argument that the Governor overstepped his authority and bypassed the legislature because these changes were initially presented to the legislature and voted down.

 It seems that the Court rejected statistics related to frequency of self-referral and it will be interesting to see if that information is re-presented because the data is in fact compelling.  I am wondering why the Court did not see it that way.

 The most important consideration for providers is that a lawsuit claiming technical errors in Executive process may temporarily keep the political barbarians from the clinical gate of the early intervention program.  However, the barbarians were using battering rams the first time around.  Just wait until they break out the trebuchets - because you can be certain that this is no longer just a pragmatic concern of the Counties related to their Medicaid costs - now it is also a slap across the face of Executive power.   

 I believe in checks and balances too - but this is a time when we should be contributing to policy creation by negotiation and participation.  Attempting to solve this through the Courts might not lead to an end that people really want.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On retained primitive reflexes

Each year I receive several emails from colleagues about 'retained primitive reflexes.'  I am also seeing an increased number of reports from local 'health care' providers who are documenting these alleged problems so I thought I would write a summary of my opinion on this topic.   Predatory 'health care' providers including some OTs, PTs, chiropractors, and behavioral optometrists are creating a new 'market' for treating this alleged 'problem.'  Parents should be very wary of these practitioners and other professionals should challenge these practices whenever they are seen. The following is the kind of information that causes concern and was provided to me by a colleague as a sample from a student's IEP: The student continues to demonstrate the following retained primitive reflexes that at times interfere with his ability to demonstrate appropriate adaptive responses: Fear Paralysis Reflex, Moro Reflex, Palmer Reflex, Tonic Labyri
Read more

Deconstructing the myth of clothing sensitivity as a 'sensory processing disorder'

Please note first that there is no formally recognized clinical designation of  'sensory processing disorder.'   It is a term constructed by occupational therapists that has not been formally recognized by the larger medical community. In our clinic we receive many referrals from local pediatricians when parents have concerns about children being overly sensitive to their clothing.  Most often the children referred are from four to seven years old and the families are severely disrupted by the children's behaviors and responses to clothing issues.  Commonly, children will have severely constricted tolerance for certain outfits, want to wear the same clothes repeatedly, complain that clothing is itchy/scratch/bumpy/wiggly/ouchie, and this all leads to disruption of daily dressing routines.  There is no doubt that the behavioral concerns are very real. The pediatricians tend to be appropriately conservative and provide families with good behavioral management suggestions
Read more

A Critical Appraisal of Therapeutic Listening

Image
History: According to Frick (2002, p. 358), auditory training has been used in Europe since the mid-1900s to address sensory processing disorders and these techniques have been recently popularized in the United States. Frick has based her Therapeutic Listening program on the work of Dr. Alfred Tomatis and Dr. Guy Berard, both of whom are French physicians. Both the Tomatis and Berard programs are delivered by specific machines using earphones but these devices do not have FDA approval and have been banned in the United States (Barrett, 2003). Frick (2001) states “With the advent of new technology, similar altered music has become available on compact disc. The discs do not replace either the Tomatis Method or the Berard Method. The compact discs do provide a less intense way to access both the auditory and vestibular systems to impact neural function and integration and are easily available to clinicians in a variety of practice arenas.” The CDs referenced on Frick’s webpages are ass
Read more