NYS Early Intervention botches billing for commercial insurance too


Today we received notification that some of our early intervention families have been sent our payments for the services we provided to children.  The payments are not supposed to be directed to the families - they are supposed to be directed to the providers or to the State for processing.

Based on our private billing experience as an outpatient clinic, it is uncommon for insurance companies to send reimbursements directly to enrollees, but it happens.  Most of the time when the insurance company does this the family hands the checks directly to us.  Unfortunately, some people don't understand what the checks are or in some situations they just view it as a 'payday' from the insurance company and they keep the payments for themselves.  We eventually learn about this after we call the insurance company after a period of non-payment and they tell us that the claims were paid.  Then we are in the awkward position of calling the patient and asking them to pay the funds that the insurance company provided to them.

Thankfully our honest and forthright early intervention family called us immediately and told us about the 30 checks that they received for services we provided.  What will be fun now is to de-tangle the mess because some of the payments are for services my agency provided and others are for services provided by others.  Additionally, there will need to send the information back to the Interim State Fiscal Agent because the payments made were only partial payments.

We also reassured the family that the insurance company was incorrect and that the family is not responsible for co-pays and deductibles.

So, it seems that commercial insurance was the last of the payments that were not being processed, but now we see that even that part of the system is horribly broken.

Congratulations are in order to NYS Governor Andrew Cuomo and Bureau of Early Intervention Director Brad Hutton.  They have destroyed the billing and payment system for this important program from stem to stern.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On retained primitive reflexes

Each year I receive several emails from colleagues about 'retained primitive reflexes.'  I am also seeing an increased number of reports from local 'health care' providers who are documenting these alleged problems so I thought I would write a summary of my opinion on this topic.   Predatory 'health care' providers including some OTs, PTs, chiropractors, and behavioral optometrists are creating a new 'market' for treating this alleged 'problem.'  Parents should be very wary of these practitioners and other professionals should challenge these practices whenever they are seen. The following is the kind of information that causes concern and was provided to me by a colleague as a sample from a student's IEP: The student continues to demonstrate the following retained primitive reflexes that at times interfere with his ability to demonstrate appropriate adaptive responses: Fear Paralysis Reflex, Moro Reflex, Palmer Reflex, Tonic Labyri
Read more

Deconstructing the myth of clothing sensitivity as a 'sensory processing disorder'

Please note first that there is no formally recognized clinical designation of  'sensory processing disorder.'   It is a term constructed by occupational therapists that has not been formally recognized by the larger medical community. In our clinic we receive many referrals from local pediatricians when parents have concerns about children being overly sensitive to their clothing.  Most often the children referred are from four to seven years old and the families are severely disrupted by the children's behaviors and responses to clothing issues.  Commonly, children will have severely constricted tolerance for certain outfits, want to wear the same clothes repeatedly, complain that clothing is itchy/scratch/bumpy/wiggly/ouchie, and this all leads to disruption of daily dressing routines.  There is no doubt that the behavioral concerns are very real. The pediatricians tend to be appropriately conservative and provide families with good behavioral management suggestions
Read more

A Critical Appraisal of Therapeutic Listening

Image
History: According to Frick (2002, p. 358), auditory training has been used in Europe since the mid-1900s to address sensory processing disorders and these techniques have been recently popularized in the United States. Frick has based her Therapeutic Listening program on the work of Dr. Alfred Tomatis and Dr. Guy Berard, both of whom are French physicians. Both the Tomatis and Berard programs are delivered by specific machines using earphones but these devices do not have FDA approval and have been banned in the United States (Barrett, 2003). Frick (2001) states “With the advent of new technology, similar altered music has become available on compact disc. The discs do not replace either the Tomatis Method or the Berard Method. The compact discs do provide a less intense way to access both the auditory and vestibular systems to impact neural function and integration and are easily available to clinicians in a variety of practice arenas.” The CDs referenced on Frick’s webpages are ass
Read more