I have no title for this

I was reading the Medscape Oncology pages today.  I received an email notification about a series of articles on palliative care and most of them were quite good.  There was a particularly interesting perspective on DNR choices and showing patients (who have terminal disease) CPR videos and how this impacted their choices for end of life care.

I started thinking that this was good information.  Then I started thinking that it is information that could be bureaucratically abused.  It worries me when I start seeing people use the word 'economics' next to 'end of life care.'  I think if we focus on quality issues and as long as we are honestly looking at quality issues then it is all ok.

Anyway, I started clicking around and then I stumbled across an older article and video about how doctors need to understand the needs of care providers.    I thought that it was a kind message and in watching the video portion I was thinking that Dr. Marshall seemed like a very kind doctor. 

He talked about how some care providers might secretly wish that they could just move forward and perhaps that is true.  I think that when a patient has been very sick for very long that this could be a very common feeling that a caregiver could have, even though it might be a conflicted and complicated and very painful feeling.  So I think he is correct in saying that medical people need to care for the caregivers.

I personally never had the kind of feeling that Dr. Marshall was referring to.  When my Dad died it was a process that took maybe a year and a half from diagnosis to his death.  I remember reading journal articles about his particular type of cancer, the relatively grim prognosis, the conversations I had with my Dad about the prognosis, the discussions that we had with his oncologist and how she told us not to read articles (!!) and on and on.  I think his oncologist also had a good heart.  Her card is still in my wallet, next to my Dad's funeral card.  I haven't quite figured out how to move either out of my wallet yet.

So I am not in the 'let's get by this process' camp.  I am more in the 'how in the world do I get by this' camp.  It has been two plus years now and when I saw Dr. Marshall's article it kind of came rushing back.  Grief is like that, I guess.  You never really can understand the pull of that riptide until you stop and understand how big that ocean is.  Oh well.

So the message from Dr. Marshall is correct.  Medical folk (and I am one) have to care for the care providers.  Everyone processes this stuff a little different.  Everyone will need a different kind of care.  Boy is this a tough issue.  Even when you are a medical person.

Comments

Cheryl said…
End of life issues are so personal. While I completely support primary care physicians getting time and reimbursement for discussing them with their clients, ultimately there has to be a time as the medical team that you step back and out of the decision. I remember a man with end stage COPD who kept coming back to the ER and being admitted to our hospital. He wasn't able to do any of his ADL tasks and could only sit on the EOB. But his wife made it very clear that they wanted no part of hospice- they wanted to keep coming to the hospital where they felt he was being best cared for. Options presented, decision made, and then it was just time to drop it.

I can appreciate your situation and hope that you have some peace... sometimes it takes a long time to come.
8:55 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On retained primitive reflexes

Each year I receive several emails from colleagues about 'retained primitive reflexes.'  I am also seeing an increased number of reports from local 'health care' providers who are documenting these alleged problems so I thought I would write a summary of my opinion on this topic.   Predatory 'health care' providers including some OTs, PTs, chiropractors, and behavioral optometrists are creating a new 'market' for treating this alleged 'problem.'  Parents should be very wary of these practitioners and other professionals should challenge these practices whenever they are seen. The following is the kind of information that causes concern and was provided to me by a colleague as a sample from a student's IEP: The student continues to demonstrate the following retained primitive reflexes that at times interfere with his ability to demonstrate appropriate adaptive responses: Fear Paralysis Reflex, Moro Reflex, Palmer Reflex, Tonic Labyri
Read more

Deconstructing the myth of clothing sensitivity as a 'sensory processing disorder'

Please note first that there is no formally recognized clinical designation of  'sensory processing disorder.'   It is a term constructed by occupational therapists that has not been formally recognized by the larger medical community. In our clinic we receive many referrals from local pediatricians when parents have concerns about children being overly sensitive to their clothing.  Most often the children referred are from four to seven years old and the families are severely disrupted by the children's behaviors and responses to clothing issues.  Commonly, children will have severely constricted tolerance for certain outfits, want to wear the same clothes repeatedly, complain that clothing is itchy/scratch/bumpy/wiggly/ouchie, and this all leads to disruption of daily dressing routines.  There is no doubt that the behavioral concerns are very real. The pediatricians tend to be appropriately conservative and provide families with good behavioral management suggestions
Read more

A Critical Appraisal of Therapeutic Listening

Image
History: According to Frick (2002, p. 358), auditory training has been used in Europe since the mid-1900s to address sensory processing disorders and these techniques have been recently popularized in the United States. Frick has based her Therapeutic Listening program on the work of Dr. Alfred Tomatis and Dr. Guy Berard, both of whom are French physicians. Both the Tomatis and Berard programs are delivered by specific machines using earphones but these devices do not have FDA approval and have been banned in the United States (Barrett, 2003). Frick (2001) states “With the advent of new technology, similar altered music has become available on compact disc. The discs do not replace either the Tomatis Method or the Berard Method. The compact discs do provide a less intense way to access both the auditory and vestibular systems to impact neural function and integration and are easily available to clinicians in a variety of practice arenas.” The CDs referenced on Frick’s webpages are ass
Read more