ABC Therapeutics Occupational Therapy Weblog

In this blog and in my textbook I have expressed some concerns about application of occupational therapy theory into distal contexts that are only marginally related to the profession.  Specifically, I have stated that although concerns about topics including the climate and social justice are fine areas for people to be interested in, we are obligated to consider whether or not application of these concepts to the occupational therapy process is generative or distracting. It is my opinion that these topics are frequently distracting, and that they confuse our stakeholders. I revisited this topic just last year when prompted by a colleague who was wondering if I ' revisited my thinking ' on the topic.  At that time, I doubled down on my criticism. One of my favorite quotes is from Konrad Lorenz, the renowned (and infamous, I suppose) ethologist, "It is a good morning exercise for a research scientist to discard a pet hypothesis every day before breakfast: it keeps him you

  I know that sometimes I start stories and they don't always get finished.  Sometimes that happens because there is no ending - or at least there is not an ending to be found with the framing I was using. That was always the nature of my private practice - and my hesitancy in discharging children and their families. Who is to say that any person's needs are completely addressed? Or that as a therapist I was able to generate a perfect and complete answer that would persist over time? Sometimes the stories I think about finished themselves and were easy to write even if it hurt.  Sometimes the stories needed some kind of ending punctuation -  a final act from the therapist. I keep thinking about one story that did not seem to have an ending, so I thought I would visit with it again. I might have found an ending. +++ I wrote, "I guess now we will see what happens next." Xinren never came back. I never heard from the family again.  I don't actually know what happen